Going Round and Round

Nonsuch30I recently read about a man who had been trying to sail from Gillingham, about 35 miles east of London, to Southampton by following the southern coast of England. He was trying to navigate with the help of only a roadmap, keeping the coastline to  his right.

‘But he ended simply doing laps of the 36-square mile Isle of Sheppey a short distance away in the mouth of the Thames.’

He must have wondered why he did not reach his destination even after sailing for hours! The poor fellow’s motorboat finally ran out of fuel after circling the island repeatedly, and he had to be rescued by coastguards.

After this experience, I don’t suppose he will attempt sailing again anytime soon, at  least not without maritime charts or navigational aids!


Circles can be deceptive, not only physically- as the sailor in the above story experienced- but also in reasoning.

Petitio Principii is the fallacy of circular reasoning. It is, in general, the fallacy of assuming as a premiss a statement which has the same meaning as the conclusion.

A common example of this fallacy is-

“There are many juvenile delinquents because many juveniles break the law, and the reason so many juveniles break the law is that they are juvenile delinquents.”

This is a fallacy, because, of course, a statement cannot prove itself. The argument has simply gone around, and returned to the same place.


Circular definitions are somewhat similar. These are definitions which do not really define the words. Wikipedia gives us an interesting example of circular definition.

The 2007 Merriam-Webster dictionary defines a “hill” and a “mountain” this way:

Hill – ” a usually rounded natural elevation of land lower than a mountain”

Mountain – ” a landmass that projects conspicuously above its surroundings and is higher than a hill”

Well, these two definitions seems to define each other, without really defining anything!


These above circles are somewhat innocuous, entertaining even. But we also read about circles which are not so harmless.

These are vicious circles.

We read about the vicious circles of poverty, of illiteracy, of low agricultural production. These are cruel circles, which prevent development from taking place.

The vicious circle of poverty means in general that once people are poor, they are likely to remain poor, unless there is some outside remedial intervention. Poor families have less resources, their children have less access to education.

These families have disadvantages because of their poverty which make it difficult for them to escape from poverty.

In short, a vicious circle.

Many economists and sociologists feel that ensuring the education and general development of poor children is the key to breaking this circle.

In India, Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 has been passed. This provides for free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years.

There is also the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, which provides for improvement in school facilities, coverage of special underprivileged focus groups, among other things.

To try to alleviate the poverty of rural families, the government has launched the National Rural Employment Guarantee schemes which guarantees one hundred days of employment in every financial year to members of rural households. These schemes are aimed at increasing the purchasing power of rural families- trying to lessen the disadvantages of their poverty, and thus help them to come out of the vicious circle.

There are many such schemes and programmes launched by the government. It is to be hoped, though, that they do actually have the effect that they are intended to have. Far too often we read about development programmes which were not successful even though there was ample funding available.

Then we wonder what the reason was. Could it be that the funds earmarked for the schemes never actually reached the intended beneficiaries?

Rural Development Minister C.P. Joshi said recently that ‘only’ Rs.7 crore has been siphoned off from a flagship rural jobs scheme.

Maybe the schemes themselves were flawed? Reports from West Bengal make us feel that the NREGA schemes are funding the building of roads that protestors have earlier dug up. Protests go on perpetually, so this building of roads will continue perpetually, without there being any actual increase in roadways.

Is there any thought going into these schemes, or does the government sanction huge amounts and then simply hope for the best?

Perhaps we are doing the same thing that the sailor from England did. He sailed without charts, and ended up circling the same island repeatedly.

Are we making the same mistake?



  1. Manju,

    I am not even sure we move in circles—we actually run in the same place the whole time, going nowhere. Whenever something needs to be righted or investigated, we appoint a commission, then reject its findings, and nothing goes anywhere. Same with the problem of junior college admissions in Mumbai–we are supposedly going the IT way in admissions, but glitches, courts, stay orders and stuff has ensured that we never move further towards any improvement.

    Maybe we are a special case of Petitio Principii, where the circle is reduced to a useless point….


  2. Only the poor are going round and round while those who are supposedly helping the poor are going up and up….

    If there were no incentives (on the sides) for making these schemes work would the authorities even go for such schemes? In the end it is only the crumbs that reach the original recipient.


  3. Lovely post. We are going round in circles – only because it is planned that way by the politicians. They see money in welfare schemes. Those for whom it is meant to benefit, do not, for them it is only on paper. For such crooked persons, life can never be straight, it is only in circles, where the starting point is them and the ending too.


  4. Providing education and employment for poor people will help them to come out of poverty. There are many schemes for providing education to poor people. Recently, ‘Agaram’ founded by Mr.Surya(Actor), promotes learning of under privileged people.


  5. Many economists and sociologists feel that ensuring the education and general development of poor children is the key to breaking this circle…I also feel the same.

    We are progressing but it is a slow process….Today my maid also has a TV,sofa, cooler..and mobile…and I think thats a good start.


  6. Terrific post, unfolding beautifully.

    I like Samvedna’s example. It’s comforting and lifts a little burden off our souls. There will always be some who will break out of one orbit and get into the next one. But, 63 years after Independence, should that percentage shame or comfort us?


  7. Great Post, Manju.

    I love the way you link up concepts so beautifully.

    And your analysis is spot on. We do seem to be going round and round in circles, with no charts and no clear idea of the point of arrival either..


  8. Suranga– The junior college admissions here are a total mess! It’s a mystery why the courts wait until the SSC results are declared before deciding on the admission criteria! It’s the same almost every year.

    Happy Kitten– I agree- some ‘privileged’ people do manage to move upwards all the time, while the poor stay in the same place.

    Chowlaji– Yes, contacts with people who have power are so useful!

    Sunder– So true- even if the schemes are not successful, they benefit the politicians who always get their ‘share’.


  9. Radha-Unfortunately that is the case- the starting point is them and the ending too.

    Giftvincy– Thanks for mentioning this scheme- ‘Agaram’. I’ll definitely read up about it.

    Yes, there are numerous such schemes for providing education. Some are implemented well. Unfortunately many are just an eyewash.

    Samvedna– Yes, that is a good start. But the process, as you say, is slow.

    I, too, agree that education is the key. And we do see a difference where educational programmes are implemented sincerely.


  10. Vinodji– Thank you!
    Often the reality is that those who do manage to break out of the circle do so with the help of NGOs or some Good Samaritans.

    The results of Govt. programmes never seem to justify the huge amounts of money spent on them!

    Smitha– Thanks!
    And as Vinodji said- This is the situation even after 63 years of Independence…


  11. Beautiful, Manju, the way you start with a general point and link them up with a practical one. I tried this method in one or two of my posts, though they are not this good!

    Government funding is like an ice cube. By the time it reaches the needy person, just one drop of water remains in the hand.

    The protesters spoiled the good roads in West Bengal, here Ramadoss cut huge old trees in protest. Later on, he planted new plants everywhere. Our people burn trains, buses and other public properties to show protest. Our money will go to rebuild them again. Again the money gets rotated among the politicians.

    I loved this post, Manju.


Do share your views here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s